No Mercy UNO as a rules dial on the existing tier, not a fourth table: 168 cards,
draw-until-playable, draw-stacking, and the twenty-five card mercy kill. Six
tiers now; a normal game never runs a line of the new code.
The engine is the whole of it so far — the felt hasn't been touched, so there is
no way to play this in a browser yet.
Two things worth knowing.
The normal tiers were mispriced, and had been for a while. They were set against
a naive win rate of 43/32/27%; it now measures 40.3/29.2/23.3%. The bots got
better at some point after the multiples were written down and nobody re-ran the
measurement — which the plan explicitly warns about, because the bots and the
tiers are a pair. Table and Full House had been charging an 18–19% house edge
instead of the 8% they were meant to. All six tiers are repriced off a fresh
measurement, and TestTheMultiplesAreStillPriced now fails the build if they
drift again. It is the test the normal tiers never had, which is how they drifted.
And No Mercy is *easier* than UNO, at every table size, so it pays less. The
mercy rule does not care whose hand hits twenty-five: it kills bots too, and
every bot it buries is one fewer seat that can beat you to the last card. A deck
built to be merciless turns out to be merciless mostly to the table.
The rake test used to assert a payout of 214, which was the 2.2x duel written
down as a number. It failed on a rake that was entirely correct. It derives the
arithmetic from the tier now: the rule is that the house takes its cut of the
profit and never touches the stake, and that holds at any multiple.
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_013M5nD7PgUboJXoDcYHzpuJ
UNO, played for chips. You stake once, sit down against one to three bots,
and going out first pays the table: 2.2x heads up, 3.6x against a full house.
Anybody else going out first takes the stake. The table size is the tier,
because it is the only dial UNO has.
The bots move inside ApplyMove. A game with opponents is normally where you
reach for a socket, and the plan says solo UNO must not — so one request plays
your move and every bot turn behind it, and hands back the whole lap as a
script the felt plays in order.
The RNG is in the state rather than an argument to it: the bots choose and a
spent deck reshuffles, so the engine needs randomness mid-game, and there is no
generator alive across requests to pass in. The seed rides in the state and each
step derives its own. The game still replays exactly as it fell.
The zero value of Color is Wild, and that is the whole point of it: a wild
played with the colour field missing from the JSON must be refused, not
quietly played as a red one. It was red for an hour.
The browser never sees a bot's card — not the deck, not a hand, not the face of
a card a bot drew, which is most of the deck. Seats cross the wire as a name and
a count.
The multiples are measured, not guessed: playing the first legal card you hold
wins 43/32/27% of the time against these bots, so the tiers price that to lose
about 8% a game and leave good play worth roughly the house's edge.
PeteFX.flyNode is the throw with the chip taken out of it, so a card can be
thrown across the felt the same way. fly() is now that with a chip in it.
Not yet driven in a browser, which in this room means not yet finished.
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_013M5nD7PgUboJXoDcYHzpuJ
