The engine has been able to play No Mercy since aca523e. Now a browser can.
The switch is a switch, not a fourth table: the tier is still the table size,
because that is what you are paid for, and the deck is the other dial. Six faces
the normal box does not print, sized by the card's own vars and never by the box
they sit in. The stack says what the bill is on the felt, in the turn line and on
the button, and under it the deck is dead — you cannot draw your way out of a
bill somebody has run up and pointed at you.
The wild draws glow. That started as decoration and turned out to be doing work:
No Mercy prints a coloured +4 right beside the wild one, and in a hand of twenty
the glow is what tells them apart.
A buried seat is not an empty one, which is the whole trap here — a seat killed
at twenty-five holds no cards, and neither does a seat that just went out and
won. The view asks the engine which it is instead of counting to zero, so the
winner is never the corpse.
Two bugs, both found in a browser and neither findable anywhere else:
The felt's stack bill was writing into the chip bar. It was [data-pending], and
so is the bar's "your chips are still coming" readout — and the bar lives inside
the table's own root and comes first in the document. A stack quietly overwrote
the escrow message and never appeared on the felt at all. A table's attributes
are not a private namespace.
And hold'em, re-driven on the 20M-hand policy (six hands, got up 61 ahead of a
100 buy-in, money conserved to the chip — Phase 4 closed), let you click a button
that did nothing: Deal, Leave and Top up stayed alive through the whole deal
animation, where send() drops the click on purpose. The lock is on the buttons
now, not only in the variable.
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_013M5nD7PgUboJXoDcYHzpuJ
A review pass, and it found the one that would have cost somebody real chips.
Side pots were only ever cut in runout() — the path taken when the betting
stops because nobody is left able to bet. But a hand reaches a showdown with an
all-in player in it and the betting having finished perfectly normally: a short
stack shoves, two players who still have chips behind call, and then keep
betting past them street after street to the river. Nothing was cut. One pot,
everybody eligible, and the short stack takes the lot — every chip the deep
players put in after they were already all-in, money that could never have been
lost to them. All-in for 100 against two players who each put in 500, and the
best hand collects 1,100 instead of the 300 it was playing for.
Chip conservation never saw it. The chips balance perfectly; they just land in
the wrong seat. And every browser session went through runout(), because a
player shoving is what ends the betting. It took reading the code.
Also from the review: play() dereferenced a table it had just been handed as
null, the top-up button offered chips the wallet could not cover, and the
trainer's ETA was sixty thousand hands optimistic on the first line it printed.
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_013M5nD7PgUboJXoDcYHzpuJ
Phase 4. Hold'em, and it's the only table in the casino that is a session
rather than a game: you buy in, play as many hands as you like, and leave with
what's in front of you. So the live row spans hands and chips cross the border
exactly twice. Everything in between is inside the engine.
The bots move inside ApplyMove, as UNO's do, which is what keeps poker off a
socket: shove all-in and the flop, turn, river, showdown and payout all come
back in one response, as a script the felt plays back.
The CFR policy the plan called "the single highest-value asset in either repo"
was never read. Not once, in the whole life of the game: the trainer wrote its
info-set keys under IP/OOP and the runtime looked them up under BTN/SB/BB, so
every lookup missed and fell silently through to a pot-odds heuristic. Nothing
looked broken, because a policy miss is not an error. And it was the wrong
policy anyway — ten big blinds deep, trained on a tree where a call always ends
the street, which is not poker. So the trainer is rewritten to play the real
engine through the real reducer, at every stack depth the table deals, and the
trainer and the table now build the key with the same function so they cannot
drift apart again. A test fails if the bots stop finding themselves in it.
Three money bugs, and the tests earned their keep. Chip conservation across a
hundred sessions caught an uncalled bet that minted chips. A var-init ordering
trap meant every card was identical, every showdown tied and every bot believed
it held exactly 50% equity. And the browser caught the rake being silently
zero — the tier said 5 meaning percent, the casino handed it 0.05 meaning a
fraction, and integer division took the house's cut down to nothing.
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_013M5nD7PgUboJXoDcYHzpuJ
