Files
Pete/internal/web
prosolis f8b07d8e6c games: the buy-in and the rake each player sees are their own, not the table's
The two-browser pass found it: at a table two humans share, the felt quoted
each of them the pair's total. "Bought in for 200" to a player who put in 100,
and a session-rake line that climbed on a pot the other one won.

Both were table totals the view read straight off the engine — correct while a
table had one human, wrong the moment it had two. Fixed along the border it
already draws: bought_in is border accounting, so it comes from the viewer's own
game_seats.staked; session rake is a within-table event, so it rides a new
per-seat Seat.Paid beside the audit's table-total s.Paid.

And top-up never grew game_seats.staked, so the storage invariant drifted by
every top-up and the felt under-reported the buy-in — it does now.

Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_013M5nD7PgUboJXoDcYHzpuJ
2026-07-14 17:17:25 -07:00
..
2026-07-13 23:00:19 -07:00
2026-07-13 23:00:19 -07:00
2026-07-14 01:19:05 -07:00
2026-07-14 01:19:05 -07:00