d961a89bf80447839429bcbdb6e5628c2354cde6
2
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 prosolis
|
c6bf36bddf |
Triage the whole queue from the keyboard, and never type an n
The last of the UX review's item 8. Ctrl+. and Ctrl+, step through the underlines from anywhere in the text; the card that opens takes focus and answers Tab / Shift+Tab / Enter / Del / ? / Esc itself. Answering a card advances to the next by itself, and the last one closes and puts the caret back in the prose — so a document is triaged in five presses of Enter. The item asked for bare Tab or n/p. Neither can exist in a text editor: an unmodified letter is a letter. They work fine once a card holds focus, which is where the item wanted them; getting there needs a chord that is safe to press mid-sentence, and mid-composition, so the entry keys are IME-guarded like every other binding. The queue is the underlines read off the decoration DOM in document order, not the suggestion list: a stop she cannot see is worse than one she never visits, and it guarantees the card can anchor itself. Escape is stopped at the card. Unhandled it would also have left distraction-free mode, restoring the sidebar and — via the rail-follows-the- mode fix — pulling the rail out from under her mid-triage. The legend is bilingual and leads with the pair language, unlike the card's English buttons: those name what she is learning, this is an instruction for operating Petal, like the status bar. Key names are as printed on her keyboard (Entrée, Suppr, Intro, Supr). The es pack's own punctuation test caught the "?" and is right in general; the key cap is one named exemption. Verified in a real browser at 1517x810 on a fresh database with no model, over CDP — a keystroke feature deserves real keystrokes. Both layouts, wrap in both directions, the accept/dismiss/advance loop, Ask Petal and back, the full triage-to-empty criterion, and Accept-all clicked from a keyboard card. The wiring has no unit test for the reason items 6, 7 and 8 recorded: jsdom has no layout. triage.ts is pure and tested; browser-verified is written down as browser-verified. Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01GJHNvirh7Hzhc9RL3HAvz7 |
||
|
prosolis
|
9224c44fff |
The es pair, and a dictionary that was quietly Spain's
Phase 25. Spanish was never built — the groundwork was all [x] (DreamDict data, the prompt language, the L1 rule gating, TTS env-discovery), which is why the plan read as though it had shipped. shippedPairs was the honest answer: the server had been refusing es on purpose. The langpack is neutral Latin American, chosen with the user: tú, ustedes, no vosotros, and the pan-American half of every vocabulary split. A vitest greps for the peninsular twins the way fr is greped for québécismes — including coger, which is not merely regional but obscene through most of Latin America. The dictionary is the story. Debian's hunspell-es symlinks twenty country codes to one file, which reads as pan-Hispanic; RLA publishes twenty-four builds per release, one per country plus a generic es that is the union, and Debian ships peninsular es_ES. The 58,622-form gap is essentially voseo, so the first version of this commit underlined vení and tenés as misspellings and called it a considered gap. The MUST_ACCEPT list was written to catch exactly that and structurally could not: it asserted the pan-Hispanic vocabulary, and every RLA variant carries the full pan-Hispanic vocabulary — only the paradigms are localised. The REP table cited as the second witness is shared by all builds too. Two independent-looking proofs, neither able to distinguish anything, agreeing with each other. The profile now demands what discriminates, each verified against the build it targets: voseo rejects es_ES and Debian, vosotros rejects es_MX, and arepa/chévere/bacán reject es_AR, which has both paradigms and would otherwise pass. 717,640 forms, 1.74 MB gzipped, 762 ms / 97 MB in a real nspell. fr and pt-PT rebuild byte-identical from their own upstream debs, so the shared script still means what it meant. Shipping the union is fr's call arrived at from the other side: coût and cout are both correct French, tienes and tenés are both correct Spanish. The dictionary holds every variety because underlining is all it can do; the copy picks a register because speaking requires one. Reviewed by four models at the usual >=2-of-4 threshold, 5 of 27 findings applied — one catching the bedtime proverb as fr's Qui dort dîne calqued into Spanish, gloss and all, which is the rule the fr header states. One below-threshold finding (a missing ¡, seen by 1 of 4 because an absent opening mark has no closing ! to look wrong against) was applied and turned into an assertion instead: the suite now rejects any native line that closes ? or ! without opening one. piper-es on es_MX-ald-medium, not the es_ES-davefx-medium the plan named — six of Piper's nine Spanish voices are peninsular, so the obvious pick was the pt-PT trap through a different door. go build/vet/test, tsc, vite, vitest 251/251. Not deployed, not seen in a browser, not read by a native speaker, and no es account exists. |