USER DECISION: drop the `sasi` profile. Not on bandwidth -- on capacity. A SASI volume is 40 MB, and the 22.8 min of unique scene footage on the source Blu-ray (streams 00000-00201, measured, not recalled) is 146 MiB at the LOWEST rate this codec makes -- more than the machine's whole 4-unit SASI space. `scsi` is the only profile now. FINDINGS 32. Then the user asked whether we were drawing the wrong conclusions about PIO vs DMA, and we were, more broadly than the question implied. Every CPU figure in FINDINGS 24-34 is scored against the full 833,333 cycles/frame with nothing subtracted for moving the bitstream off disk. Debiting the HD63450 cycle-steal at the long-standing 8 clk/word ESTIMATE, "1 frame of 120 misses" becomes 84 of 120, median 112.4%. PIO at the span rate is 99.8% of the machine. Spans buy cycles by spending bandwidth and the bandwidth returns as steal, so 31.6's "fits completely" becomes a worst frame of 114.3%. 10 fps absorbs it: median 93.7%, 1/120. FINDINGS 35. `11_cpu_budget.py` takes --io dma|pio|none, defaults to dma, and warns if asked for none. Also landed: - item 1 done: the cost model checked against the 68000 on a cost-aware container, -3.07% to +0.01%, whole-window mean -1.22%. FINDINGS 34. - item 4 done: the container carries its own 4-byte record alignment (DLX2). 94/120 record starts were on odd addresses -- an address error, not a slow read -- now 0/120 for 16 B/s. Re-encoding reproduces 31.1 exactly. FINDINGS 33. - a `scsi` window does not fit the 2 MB machine the rig emulates (2.84 MB of stream past a 0x200000 ceiling). The gate now verifies 80 of 120 frames and SAYS so, and fails loudly when the pass does not complete, instead of reporting a phantom 49,005-pixel diff. FINDINGS 36. Three near-misses this session had one shape: an unobservable run nearly produced a false finding. stdbuf -oL on any MAME job that prints progress -- a file is block-buffered too, and a run that is merely finishing looks exactly like one that is wedged. check.sh ALL GREEN. Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01194oWYW8DQXK1SZ2DnChW6
Dragon's Lair — Sharp X68000 port
Porting Dragon's Lair to a stock X68000 (68000 @ 10MHz, 2MB, SCSI).
This is fundamentally a video codec problem, not a game-logic problem: the game logic is a scene table with branching input windows; the difficulty is pushing ~22 minutes of Don Bluth animation through a 10MHz 68000.
Green-light check: ./tools/bench/check.sh (~3 min, needs the Blu-ray
mounted) re-runs both display regression tests, the rate-control drift test, the
display-path coherency counterexample and a 120-frame 68000 decode, then prints
ALL GREEN.
Read first
docs/FINDINGS.md— measured hardware facts, content statistics, codec decision, and a section on measurement traps that produced three separate false results. Read §4 before trusting any pipeline number.docs/STATUS.md— current state, working setup, blockers, next steps. Start here. It also lists what has been explicitly abandoned, so old ideas do not get re-proposed.docs/BENCHMARK.md— how to measure the storage subsystem, and why a bandwidth figure out of MAME would be meaningless.docs/HARDWARE.md— X68000 GVRAM/CRTC reference.
Layout
docs/ findings, status, hardware reference
tools/analysis/ measurement scripts, numbered in the order they were written
(01/02 marked BROKEN deliberately, kept as regression refs).
Run from the repo root — they import from tools/encoder/.
07 finds the hottest sustained window in a stream; 08 renders
source | decoded | block-mode map as .webm; 09 is the
rate-control drift gate (FINDINGS 26/27) and is part of
check.sh -- it exits non-zero if the encoder ever again
reports a reconstruction no decoder would produce.
10 is a COUNTEREXAMPLE, and exits non-zero by design: it
demonstrates that the two-display-path plan of FINDINGS
24.5/25.6 corrupts 70 of 120 frames (FINDINGS 28.1).
11 scores a container against the MEASURED per-mode block
costs without needing MAME; 12 prices the literal-span mode of
FINDINGS 30 against those same mode maps, and prints whether a
scene cut still fits at 12fps; 13 measures what fitting the
CPU budget costs in dB (FINDINGS 31) and caches H.build so the
search loop is seconds, not minutes.
tools/bench/ MAME Lua injection harness + 68000 benchmark sources.
`check.sh` re-runs both display regression tests (~40 s).
`blit.s`/`blit.lua` time the full-frame GVRAM blit on the
68000 itself (FINDINGS 24) — not part of check.sh, because
wall timings would make the green-light check host-sensitive.
`span.sh` (prep_spans.py + span.lua + blit.s v5/v6) measures
the literal-span mode the same way (FINDINGS 30, ~25 s); it
also asserts all 23 timing configs drew a pixel-exact frame.
`crtc_mode.lua` is the single source of truth for CRTC R00-R08
and R20 — do not write CRTC values anywhere else.
`prep_dlx.py`/`decode.lua`/`verify_decode.py` load, time and
verify `src/player/decode.s`; the verify pass is in check.sh.
tools/vasm/ vasm m68k assembler (built from source)
tools/encoder/ hybrid VQ encoder + DLX2 container writer (working).
DLX2 4-byte-aligns every frame record: an odd `move.l` is an
ADDRESS ERROR on a 68000, not a slow read (FINDINGS 28.3).
dlx.py is the reference DECODER -- ground truth for the 68000.
src/player/ decode.s: the 68000 DLX decoder. Pixel-exact; 1 frame of 120
over the 12fps CPU budget once the mode decision prices
cycles. See FINDINGS 28 and 31.
assets/ extracted frames/audio (gitignored)
Encoder
python3 tools/encoder/extract.py 00020 /tmp/fr 12 crop
python3 tools/encoder/encode.py /tmp/fr out.dlx --profile scsi --preview p.png
One profile: scsi, 280 KB/s. The 110 KB/s sasi profile was dropped in
session 9 on capacity, not bandwidth — a SASI volume is limited to 40 MB, and
the game's 22.8 minutes of footage is 146 MiB even at that rate (FINDINGS 32).
The rate point may return under another name once the delivery medium is
settled, because a 1x CD-ROM sustains ~150 KB/s and CD-ROM is the only period
medium with the capacity.
The profile bitrate is a ceiling: lam is bisected per frame under a leaky
bucket, so the profile's lam is a quality floor rather than a setting
(--fixed-lam opts out).
There are two ceilings, on two different axes. The second is the 68000's
decode budget: mu is bisected per frame against 833,333 cycles so the frame
also decodes in time, which takes the worst sustained window from 37 frames
over budget to 1 for 0.62 dB at scsi (FINDINGS 31). It is on by default; --no-cpu-fit
restores session 7 behaviour. Unlike bytes, cycles have no bucket — there is no
double buffer to decode ahead into, so it is a hard per-frame ceiling. The codec is
a Cinepak-style hybrid: each 4x4 block is coded as SKIP, one 4x4 codeword, four
2x2 codewords, or RAW literal pixels, chosen per block by rate-distortion.
The RAW escape means lam=0 is pixel-exact against the palettised frame, so the
quality knob spans lossless to heavily-compressed without changing the bitstream.
Profiles are derived from a bandwidth figure, not chosen by eye:
python3 tools/encoder/profile_gen.py --bw-mbps 4 --name scsi
On reading
docs/FINDINGS.md: it is append-only and several later sections overturn earlier ones. Superseded sections carry a blockquote at the top pointing to the correction — heed those, especially 18 (reversed by 21).
Source media (DRAGONS_LAIR.iso) and ROMs are gitignored — supply your own.
Not every large stream is game footage. 00216 is the feature with a
burned-in commentary picture-in-picture and 00215 is the commentary itself —
the two largest files on the disc. The clean 9.4-minute animation is 00223.
See FINDINGS 25.1 before running any size-ranked survey.