Files
Dragon-s-Lair-X68k/docs/STATUS.md
T
prosolis b322e84cd4 Get a real Dragon's Lair frame onto the emulated X68000
First pixels on an actual X68000 screen. Everything up to now was Python-side
or a headless -video none run, which cannot snapshot at all.

The blocker was not the video controller. The IPL leaves CRTC R20 = 0x0B16,
and bit 11 is "G-VRAM set to buffer", which makes MAME's draw_gfx() return
early. GVRAM writes still land and read back correctly while the layer is
invisible, so six attempts at $E82400/$E82500/$E82600 all rendered black with
every register holding the value I intended.

Two more facts, both confirmed against MAME 0.277 source rather than assumed:

- $E8E001 monitor contrast is left at 14 by the IPL, scaling all output to
  93.3%. The player must set it to 15. Contrast 0 blanks the screen, which is
  a free fade-to-black for scene transitions.
- The palette word is GGGGGRRRRRBBBBBI with a shared LSB, expanded as
  pal6bit((field<<1)|I). With contrast at 15 the render is pixel-exact, not
  merely close, which also confirms the 1024-byte GVRAM line stride.

That exactness gives a new quality ceiling: the 15-bit+I palette alone costs
38.88 dB against the 24-bit palettised source, the same order as the scsi
profile's own codec error. scsi is close to display-transparent on hardware,
which bounds how much further it is worth raising.

Unblocks next step 2, the 68000 decoder skeleton, which now has a known-good
reference image to diff against.

Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01194oWYW8DQXK1SZ2DnChW6
2026-08-23 13:12:27 -07:00

12 KiB

Status & next-session handoff — end of session 2 (2026-08-23)

Decisions locked

decision value why
Target CPU 68000 @ 10MHz (stock) hardest honest constraint
Display mode 256 colors, 256x192 in 256x256 CRTC mode every mode is 1 word-access/pixel, so 256c is free vs 16c
Double buffer none — page 1 sacrificed enables movem.l 24px bursts; delta coding needs a RAM reference frame anyway
Codec hybrid VQ: SKIP / V1 4x4 / V4 four-2x2 / RAW, per-block rate-distortion flat 4x4 VQ was measured and rejected — see FINDINGS 9-10
Quality modes two: sasi and scsi (USER DECISION, session 2) one codec, one decoder, one bitstream; only lam differs
Framerate 12 fps, explicit decimation source has zero duplicate frames; no free "twos" win
Emulator MAME 0.277 x68000 accurate enough that measured cycles mean something
SNES project reuse MIT — cleared data/events/ scene graph is reusable with attribution

The SASI/SCSI question is RESOLVED

Session 1 left "which machine do we target" open. The user's answer: ship both, as two quality profiles. This is now implemented rather than hypothetical — the bitrate ceiling is a build parameter in tools/encoder/ratectl.py:

profile target lam quality (00020 / 00146) machine
sasi 110 KB/s 60 36.9 / 29.6 dB stock 10MHz ACE/EXPERT
scsi 280 KB/s 10 39.4 / 32.3 dB Super/XVI, or CZ-6BS1 board

Sized against the user's working figure of 4 Mbps = 488 KB/s sustained, on SD-backed SCSI (BlueSCSI / SCSI2SD) — so that rate is a bus-limited constant, not an average over seek latency.

Both profiles fit with room. Ring-buffer simulation on the real per-frame sizes gives zero required prefill for every scene at both profiles: the fill delivers 40.69 KB per frame time and only one measured frame (42.10 KB) exceeds that, recovered by the next. A 256 KB buffer carries ~1 s of stall tolerance, far more than an SD-backed seek needs. FINDINGS 21.

An earlier warning here said scsi did not fit because a frame peaked at 96.4% of the pipe. That compared instantaneous demand to a sustained rate as if they had to match frame-by-frame; with a buffer the test is cumulative, and it passes.

scsi is now within 0.5 dB of the palette ceiling on 00020. These were initially set at 45 / 75 KB/s, which was 12% / 7% bus utilisation — read off the RD curve rather than derived from the hardware. See FINDINGS 17.

Codebooks are k=256 with 1-byte indices in both profiles. k=1024 was measured and rejected — see FINDINGS 14, it was a false-good result from a rate model that undercharged the index. Do not ship past lam~800; FINDINGS 15 has the cliff.

Because of the RAW escape mode, lam=0 is pixel-exact against the palettised frame (measured 0.00 dB loss). The profiles are two points on one continuous rate-distortion curve, not two codecs.


What session 2 settled

  1. The critical-path question is answered. "Does VQ soften Bluth's linework unacceptably?" — flat 4x4 VQ: yes, badly. The hybrid (SKIP/V1/V4/RAW): no. Verified by eye, not just PSNR. See docs/FINDINGS.md 9-11 and the two images in docs/images/. Both profiles use k=256; see item 2b.
  2. Session 1's 12fps bitrate was wrong (183 KB/s claimed, 340 KB/s measured). Halving the framerate does not halve the bitrate. FINDINGS 8. 2b. A fourth false-good result was produced and caught this session — k=1024 codebooks looked like a +2.4 dB free win because the rate model charged 1 byte for a 10-bit index. FINDINGS 14. The k=256 configuration ships.
  3. The 256-colour palettised frame is the real quality ceiling and it looks excellent. Judge the codec against that, not against 1080p.
  4. Encoder exists and produces a real bitstream: tools/encoder/.

Encoder — working

python3 tools/encoder/extract.py 00020 /tmp/fr_00020 12 crop
python3 tools/encoder/encode.py  /tmp/fr_00020 out.dlx --profile sasi --preview p.png
file role
extract.py .m2ts -> 256x192 PNGs, 12fps, spatial-only denoise
vq.py palette, blockify, hand-rolled k-means (no sklearn on this box), PSNR
vq_hybrid.py the codec: 4 block modes + lagrangian mode decision
ratectl.py SASI/SCSI profiles, leaky-bucket rate control
encode.py CLI + DLX1 container writer

DLX1 container layout is documented in the encode.py docstring. All multi-byte fields are big-endian so the 68000 reads them with a plain move.

Known encoder gaps

  • Rate control is written but not yet wired into encode.py — the CLI uses a fixed lam from the profile. ratectl.encode_rate_controlled() exists and builds a lam-ladder per frame; it needs hooking up and validating.
  • Payload is deliberately NOT entropy-coded — deflate decode does not fit in the 68000's frame budget (FINDINGS 17.2). Do not "optimise" this later.
  • Codebooks are per-scene and rebuilt from scratch; no inter-scene reuse.
  • _paint is a Python per-block loop — fine for prototyping, slow for a full disc encode. Vectorise before the 224-stream run.

Working setup (unchanged from session 1, re-verified)

MAME ROMs~/mame/roms/x68000.zip. Must pass -bios ipl10.

mame x68000 -bios ipl10 -video none -sound none -nothrottle -seconds_to_run 3

Assemblertools/vasm/vasmm68k_mot -Fbin -o out.bin in.s

Blu-rayudisksctl loop-setup -r -f DRAGONS_LAIR.iso -> /media/reala-misaki/BDROM (still mounted as of end of session 2).

MAME Lua harnesstools/bench/*.lua, working. Three gotchas (retain the notifier subscription in a global; the stack register is SP not A7; autoboot_script fires at PC=0 before boot) are documented in FINDINGS.

Two shell traps, both hit again this session:

  • piping MAME (or any long job) through grep block-buffers — write to a file.
  • pkill -f <pattern> matches your own shell and kills it (exit 144). Use pkill -x or kill by PID.
  • until ! pgrep -f foo.py; do sleep; done watcher loops never exit. The watching shell's own command line contains the string foo.py, so pgrep -f matches the watcher itself and the loop spins forever. Session 2 left 11 of these wedged for over an hour. Wait on the PID (while kill -0 $PID) or on a sentinel file the job touches when it finishes -- never on a -f name match.
  • timeout N mame ... does not kill MAME. MAME catches SIGTERM and, with an autoboot script blocked waiting on a flag that never arrives, never reaches its shutdown path. timeout without -k then waits forever while MAME burns a full core at -nothrottle. Always timeout -k 5 N.

Disk throughput benchmark — still blocked, no longer gating

IOCS _B_READ returns -1 uniformly. Full diagnosis and the four untested hypotheses are in session 1's notes (git history of this file, commit 65112b9); the ordered plan for retrying is in docs/BENCHMARK.md.

Status changed twice this session — read this rather than the git history. It was briefly promoted to critical-path while the working bandwidth figure was misread as 4 MB/s. With the correct figure (4 Mbps = 488 KB/s) and the ring-buffer simulation showing zero required prefill for both profiles (FINDINGS 21), the design no longer hangs on it. Pixel-exact on SCSI is not available at 4 Mbps — it needs 92-97% of the pipe — so there is no longer a "measure it and maybe ship transparent" decision waiting.

What the benchmark is still worth doing for:

  • Confirming the 4 Mbps figure. It is user-supplied and its provenance is not recorded. Every profile hangs off it.
  • Confirming DMA is actually used. If transfers fall back to PIO the CPU cost rises far above the ~12-15% cycle-steal estimate and CPU becomes the binding constraint. This is the worst plausible outcome and the cheapest to check — do it first.

Do not try to get the bandwidth number out of MAME. Its SCSI/SASI devices are functional models, not timing-accurate; a KB/s figure from MAME measures the emulator's scheduler. docs/BENCHMARK.md covers the three-tier approach (MAME validates the path, derivation bounds it, real hardware settles it).

Display path — WORKING, verified end to end (session 3)

The first real frame is on screen: docs/images/x68k_first_frame_compare.png. Full write-up in FINDINGS 22. Harness: tools/bench/show_frame.lua + tools/bench/prep_frame.py.

Three facts the player MUST honour, none of which were guessable:

what where value
Un-hide the graphics layer CRTC R20 $E80028 clear bit 11 ("G-VRAM set to buffer"); IPL leaves 0x0B16
Colour setup (256c) CRTC R20 bits 9-8 0x0100 -> R20 = 0x0116
Monitor contrast $E8E001 bits 3-0 IPL leaves 14; write 15 or everything renders 7% dark

Bit 11 is the one that cost the most time: GVRAM writes land and read back correctly while the layer is invisible, so the video controller looks guilty and is not. Contrast 0 blanks the screen — free fade-to-black for transitions.

Palette format is now confirmed from MAME source, not assumed: GGGGGRRRRRBBBBBI (G 15:11, R 10:6, B 5:1, shared LSB I), expanded as pal6bit((field<<1)|I). With contrast at 15 the render is pixel-exact.

New ceiling: the 15-bit+I palette alone costs 38.88 dB against the 24-bit palettised source — the same order as the scsi profile's own codec error (39.4 dB). scsi is close to display-transparent on real hardware. See FINDINGS 22.4 before considering raising quality further.

Snapshot recipe that works (-video none CANNOT snapshot):

SDL_VIDEODRIVER=dummy mame x68000 -bios ipl10 -video soft -window \
  -sound none -nothrottle -plugins -autoboot_script <script>.lua \
  -snapshot_directory ./snap -snapview native -seconds_to_run 6

-snapview native drops MAME's LED artwork and gives a clean 768x512 screen.

Next steps, in priority order

  1. Full-disc survey. Only 4 clips of 1.2-1.7 s out of 224 streams have been measured, and 00146 already runs 23% hotter than 00020. A sustained action sequence is the one thing that could still break the bitrate. Classify menu vs content first (FINDINGS 13) or the averages are diluted by static menus. Vectorise _paint before this run — it is a Python per-block loop.
  2. 68000 decoder skeleton. Parse DLX1, expand codebooks to word-per-pixel, blit SKIP/V1/V4/RAW. Measure real cycles with the existing MAME Lua harness. Now unblocked — the display path is verified (FINDINGS 22) and tools/bench/show_frame.lua gives a known-good reference image to diff the 68000's output against. Validates the 38% full-frame blit estimate that the whole CPU budget rests on. Still needs a real CRTC mode table for 256x256; the harness deliberately borrows the IPL's timing and invents nothing.
  3. Wire rate control into encode.py. No longer a blocker (FINDINGS 21), but it is what gives a deterministic ceiling over content not yet measured, which was the original reason for choosing VQ. Insurance, not a fix. Pairs with (1).
  4. Confirm DMA vs PIO in MAME (see the benchmark section above) — cheap, and the only thing that could still move CPU into the binding position.
  5. Resolve the framing question (FINDINGS 12: crop vs squash vs wide). Needs an eyeball against arcade reference, not a measurement.
  6. Import the scene graph. SNES project data/events/ (MIT, cleared), cross-checked against DirkSimple (zlib) which transcribed the same data independently — diff them to catch transcription errors before committing any of it to 68000 tables.
  7. ADPCM audio. MSM6258, 15.6kHz mono, 7.8 KB/s — already budgeted in ratectl.py, not yet extracted or encoded.

Explicitly abandoned — do not re-propose

  • Entropy-code the payload. Deflate decode is ~216% of the frame budget on a 68000; LZ4 is ~54% with no room beside a 38% blit (FINDINGS 17.2). All bitrates are raw payload. This also demotes the "247 KB/s lossless" figure in FINDINGS 8 to a compression upper bound, not a shippable design.
  • k=1024 codebooks. False-good result from a rate model that charged 1 byte for a 10-bit index (FINDINGS 14). k=256 wins at every matched bitrate.
  • Flat 4x4 VQ. Rejected by eye (FINDINGS 9).

Not yet started

  • Any 68000 player code
  • ADPCM audio extraction/encoding
  • Disk image packaging
  • Game logic (scene branching, input windows, death clips)